Click To Call

Email Us For A Free Consultation

No fees for inquiries

(Free consultations are available only in personal injury cases
& it costs nothing to inquire). All inquiries are confidential.
Read our disclaimer

Personal Injury Verdicts & Awards

Jury finds WV Health Care System, doctor negligent in death of infant

The Citizens' Voice - Wilkes-Barre, PA

By Tim Gulla
Staff Writer

A jury of nine men and three women determined late Thursday afternoon in Luzerne County Court that an area hospital was more negligent for the death of an infant than the Kingston obstetrician who admitted he abandoned his patient when she needed him most.

Assigning 70 percent of the responsibility to Wyoming Valley Health Care System, doing business as Nesbitt Memorial Hospital, and 30 percent of the responsibility to Dr. Mark Polin, the jury panel awarded $6.7 million in damages to Heidi and Scott Schukraft for the Jan. 9, 1997 death of their infant son, Scott Jr.

"We're thrilled with the verdict, but there is no winner here," Heidi Schukraft said after the verdict. "It wasn't easy bringing this to trial, but I think we did the right thing."

Technically, the trial is not yet over. One major decision remains, punitive damages.

The jury impaneled more than two weeks ago to hear the case could have brought back into court today to decide whether or not punitive damages, which are meant to punish the defendants, should be awarded.

However, Attorney Joseph Quinn Jr., who represents the Schukraft family, said after the trial, "I have been advised by everyone they'd like to settle the case."

If settlement negotiations on the punitive damages are not fruitful by Monday, Quinn said he will inform the court and ask for trial to reconvene on this issue. He explained that the court has the power to recall the same jury, or impanel a new one.

The extremely complex trial, which included allegations of cover-ups, centered on Scott Jr's Jan. 9, 1997 death, minutes after he was born.

It was contended at trial that the child essentially suffocated due to fetal distress caused by the continued administration of a labor inducing drug, Pitocin, to Schukraft. Had the use of the drug been turned off, it was contended, the child would have survived.

However, counsel for the Schukrafts, Joseph Quinn Jr., alleged that Dr. Polin and hospital nurses misread clear signs of fetal distress on a fetal heart rate monitor and the drug was continually, and increasingly, administered to Schukraft.

Polin's legal counsel admitted the doctor was negligent in the case, saying he misread fetal heart readings at 6:30 p.m. on Jan. 9, 1997 and unintentionally dozed off in a nearby doctor's lounge 30 minutes later.

Although Polin accepted his own responsibility, his counsel claimed that the nurses attending to Schukraft never came to get him when problems arose with the unborn child. Polin allegedly awoke only minutes before Schukraft was ready to deliver her child.

The next day, after learning that nurses had wrote in the medical records he was "aware" of what was transpiring the night before, Polin wrote an addendum to the medical records in which he admitted he had dozed off.

Legal counsel for the hospital admitted the nurses attending to Schukraft were negligent because they had an independent ability to stop the administration of the Pitocin but failed to do so. However, the hospital's legal counsel contended that the nurses relied on Dr. Polin's interpretation of the infant's condition.

It was also contended by the hospital that Polin was not asleep during the critical time period in question.

The jury panel, in handing up its decision on Thursday, determined that the actions of Dr. Polin and the hospital staff on Jan. 9, 1997 did not represent mere negligence, but "reckless indifference or reckless disregard for the safety and well being of Baby Schukraft."

This decision by the jury set the stage for the as-of-yet undecided determination on punitive damages.

A key defense for the hospital system and its affiliates, Associated OB-GYN Specialists and General Medical Services, was that they could not be held responsible for Polin's actions, or inaction, because he was acting outside the scope of his employment and could be considered an employee.

The jury rejected this claim, finding not only that Polin was an employee or agent of the defendants, who was acting in an official capacity, but also that Polin was not acting in an individual capacity.

It was unclear after the trial how the $6.7 million verdict would be split among the defendants. Quinn noted that all of the defendants were covered by the same insurance carrier.

Daniel Ryan, had no comment after the verdict.

Attorney Patrick Carey, who represented Wyoming Valley Health Care System Inc., also declined comment, saying the system would be sending out a statement.

Attorney Quinn commented after the verdict, "In this case, I think it was important for the public to hear this case."

He acknowledged that there was an attempt to settle the case prior to trial. "But not at the appropriate levels."

In his closing arguments, Quinn asked the jury to find that the hospital was more responsible for the child's death than Polin.

"There's not one scapegoat alone in this and that's what they (the hospital) tried to make him (Polin)," Quinn told the jury.

He added, "This is a couple who were betrayed by the system." The doctor should have seen the signs of fetal distress and should not have let Heidi Schukraft's side, Quinn argued. And, "Every nurse who came in (the room) knew or should have known there was a problem that needed immediate intervention."

The jury's verdict was comprised of $200,000 award for the past, present, and future loss of Scott Jr's aid society and comfort; a $1.5 million award for Scott Jr's lost earnings potential; a $2.5 million award for Heidi Schukraft's past, present and future emotional distress; and a $2.5 million award for Scott Schukraft's past, present and future emotional distress.

In handing up it's decision on the two awards for emotional distress, the jury determined that $1.5 million in damages resulted from Polin's negligence, and that $3.5 million in damages resulted from the hospital system's negligence.

PLEASE NOTE: Every case is fact specific, and these results do not guaranty the same results will be obtained in a different case.

About HKQ Law

Hourigan, Kluger & Quinn is considered one of the top civil litigation and commercial law firms that has had the privilege of representing more families in the courtroom than any other NEPA firm. The attorneys at HKQ Law have been honored as Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, Best Law Firms by US News and World Report, and have received the AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbel. HKQ Law was recently recognized for one of the top 20 Verdicts in Pennsylvania.

The firm’s Personal Injury Team, led by Attorney Joe Quinn, Jr., has won some of the largest verdicts and settlements in the region's history. The Personal Injury Team focuses on a wide array of personal injury claims and civil litigation, including medical malpractice, auto and truck accidents, aviation accidents, unsafe vehicles, dangerous or defective products, workplace injuries (worker's compensation), construction site accidents, claim denials by insurance companies, dangerous drugs, defective children's products, nursing home abuse and neglect, and falls due to unsafe conditions (slip and fall).

Attorney Joseph A Quinn, Jr. is one of only 100 attorneys in the United States (and one of only three in Pennsylvania) honored with membership in the Inner Circle of Trial Advocates, and one of only 500 attorneys worldwide chosen to be a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. He has been a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer every year since the program began and has been listed in The Best Lawyers in America every year since the publication was established in 1987. Best Lawyers also named him top personal injury attorney for Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley. In addition, Best Lawyers, in conjunction with U.S. News & World Report, has designated HKQ a Tier 1 Best Law Firm across multiple categories in Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley.

Since the inception of the firm, the Commercial / Corporate Team led by Attorney Allan Kluger has provided comprehensive, integrated legal services to many of Northeastern and Eastern Pennsylvania's largest corporations, businesses, banks, non-profits and institutions, handling matters involving labor and employment, wills, trusts and estate planning, estate administration, elder law, commercial transactions, residential and commercial real estate, zoning, land use and development, telecommunications, mediations and arbitrations, commercial litigation, title insurance, business planning and business succession, corporate/business structuring, employment discrimination law for employers, banking, creditor’s rights, finance, lender liability defense, covenants not to compete, construction law, mergers and acquisitions and other business matters.

Additional information can be found at or by calling (800) 760-1529.



As Hourigan, Kluger and Quinn addresses the concerns raised by COVID-19, the health and safety of our clients, employees and friends of the firm remain our top priority.

These are very difficult and scary times and we hope that you and your loved ones are safe and symptom free. We recognize that so many of you are understandably anxious about your health, the economic impact of this pandemic and all of the consequences of social isolation.

We also recognize that many of you are anxious about how the coronavirus is impacting the Court systems, our firm and your cases. Although all of our offices are closed, our firm has remained fully operational and we have initiated procedures that allow all of our attorneys and staff to work remotely from their homes. Each of us and our staff will respond to any emails and calls about your cases as quickly as possible.

Our Federal and State Courts have instituted significant changes in their calendars as a result of the coronavirus. Although most courthouses are closed to the public, and Hearings and Trials will be delayed for some time, there are matters that can proceed telephonically and by video. Despite these changes in the Court calendars, we are working diligently on your cases and are determined to do whatever we possibly can to assure an early and just recovery for you and your loved ones. Even under these difficult circumstances, we believe that "Nobody will work harder for you than we will."

With regard to new potential clients, we are not in a position to have an in-person new client meeting, but we will be conducting these initial meetings via phone. New potential clients should call us for a free telephone consultation at (570) 287-3000.


Back to Top