Click To Call

Email Us For A Free Consultation

No fees for inquiries

(Free consultations are available only in personal injury cases
& it costs nothing to inquire). All inquiries are confidential.
Read our disclaimer

Personal Injury Verdicts & Awards

$7 Million Settlement In Suit Arising From Esophageal Intubation

73-year old Frank Thornton was admitted to Mercy Hospital on August 17, 2000 in order to undergo a biopsy and possible lobectomy relative to a 1 cm nodule that had been discovered on an incidental x-ray performed five and one-half months earlier. Although the lesion had remained stable in size and the interpreting radiologist simply recommended that a repeat diagnostic study be done in 3 months, the Defendant, Walter J. Boris, D.O., advised Mr. Thornton that he required surgery. Dr. Boris admitted that he never gave the patient the option of having a fine needle biopsy.

On the morning of surgery, the Defendant, Esther McKenzie, M.D., a locumtenens anesthesiologist who had failed the written portion of her board certification examination on 5 separate occasions, was assigned to Frank's surgery. At trial, Mercy Hospital admitted that Dr. McKenzie was not properly credentialed and that her privileges had lapsed nine days before Mr. Thornton's surgery. Additionally, Plaintiff' s hospital administration expert opined that the hospital had not only violated no less than 46 licensure regulations and Joint Commission standards, but had also violated a number of the hospital's own internal policies and bylaws.

Dr. McKenzie intubated Mr. Thornton with a double-lumen endotracheal tube at approximately 8:30 a.m. and attempted to verify the position of the tube via bronchoscopy. When she failed to identify tracheal rings, she asked Dr. Boris to check placement, and he was likewise unable to identify tracheal rings. Thereafter, Dr. McKenzie and Dr. Boris discussed whether it would be feasible to proceed with surgery without confirming tracheal placement of the tube. Several minutes later, one of the operating room nurses observed abdominal distension and immediately suspected that the tube had been placed in the esophagus as opposed to the windpipe. Although she understood that the patient would be deprived of oxygen with an esophageal intubation, she admittedly turned her back to the patient without notifying either of the physicians. Six to ten minutes after the initial intubation, the breathing tube was replaced and Mr. Thornton's condition immediately improved. Unfortunately, he had already sustained diffuse and irreversible brain injury due to the lack of oxygen.

After the incident, Mr. Thornton's family was not told about the events in the Operating Room and were led to believe that Mr. Thornton's failure to awaken was simply related to the effects of anesthesia. Even after he developed continuous seizures, the true facts were not disclosed. Plaintiff's counsel requested the medical records which did not reference abdominal distension and/or the fact the tube was misplaced. Moreover, after suit was filed, Dr. Boris was deposed and claimed lack of recall as to the events. Nonetheless, the hospital's risk manager later testified that Dr. Boris came into her office within hours of the incident and told her that he had observed abdominal distension and believed the breathing tube had been misplaced.

Approximately three weeks after the initial insult, Mr. Thornton was transferred to Hershey Medical Center and life support was discontinued approximately one week later. At the request of the Dauphin County Coroner, Wayne K. Ross, MD performed an autopsy and suspected that Mr. Thornton had died as a result of an esophageal intubation. He then asked that an anesthesiologist, Stephen Laucks, MD, review the records. Dr. Laucks concluded that Mr. Thornton sustained irreversible brain damage as a result of inadequate ventilation. Accordingly, Mr. Thornton's official death certificate listed his cause of death as therapeutic misadventure.
Injury: Death.

Result: $7,000,000 settlement, reached after five days of trial.

Additional conditions of settlement required Mercy Hospital to acknowledge that this was not a frivolous lawsuit and that it should have told the family the truth about what had occurred from the beginning. Mercy Hospital will also set up an educational program in Mr. Thornton's name.

Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses: Emilio B. Lobato, M.D., anesthesia, Steven D. Barnes, M.D., anesthesia, John H. Eichhorn, M.D., anesthesia, Stephen O. Laucks, M.D., anesthesia, Peter J. Corey, M.D., surgery, Larry R. Kaiser, M.D., surgery, Justin E. Doheny, Hospital Administration; Barry M. Shmookler, M.D., Pathology, John J. Shane, M.D., Pathology, Wayne K. Ross, M.D., Pathology; Clifford Beinart, M.D., Radiology; Bruce D. Charash, M.D., Cardiology; Dr. Adrian R.M. Upton, Neurology; Lori M. Fuehrer, RN, Nursing; Richard Fischbein, M.D., Psychiatry; Andrew G. Verzilli, Ph.D., Economist.

Defendants Expert Witnesses: Adam Hauser, M.D., Anesthesiology; Daniel Woody, M.D., Surgery; Michael Barrett, M.D., Cardiology; Thaddeus Bartter, M.D., Pulmonology/Critical Care; Paul Hoyer, M.D., Pathology; Robert Schwab, M.D., Cardiology; Edmond Cohen, M.D., Anesthesiology; John M. Field, M.D., Cardiology; W. Andrew Kofke, M.D., Anesthesiology; Jo Grandelli, RN - Nursing; J. Russell Walsh, Hospital Administration.

Plaintiff's Attorneys: Joseph A. Quinn, Jr., Michelle M. Quinn, and Joseph Lipinski of HKQ Law, Wilkes-Barre, PA
Defendants Attorneys: John Durkin Scranton, PA and James Saxton - Lancaster, PA (for Defendants, Mercy Hospital, Wilkes-Bane, PA, Mercy Health Partners, and Mercy Med-Care, Inc. d/b/a Mercy Physician Network); Scott Kramer, Philadelphia, PA and Dana Ash, Philadelphia, PA (for Defendant, Esther McKenzie, M.D.); George Nace, Allentown, PA and Tara Reid, Allentown, PA (for Defendant, Walter J Boris, D. 0.)

Thornton v. Mercy Med-Care, Inc., No. 2951-C of 2001 and No. 5770-C of 2002 (Luzerne County Ct. of Common Pleas, Pa. Jan. 13, 2003)

PLEASE NOTE: Every case is fact specific, and these results do not guaranty the same results will be obtained in a different case.

About HKQ Law

Hourigan, Kluger & Quinn is considered one of the top civil litigation and commercial law firms that has had the privilege of representing more families in the courtroom than any other NEPA firm. The attorneys at HKQ Law have been honored as Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, Best Law Firms by US News and World Report, and have received the AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbel. HKQ Law was recently recognized for one of the top 20 Verdicts in Pennsylvania.

The firm’s Personal Injury Team, led by Attorney Joe Quinn, Jr., has won some of the largest verdicts and settlements in the region's history. The Personal Injury Team focuses on a wide array of personal injury claims and civil litigation, including medical malpractice, auto and truck accidents, aviation accidents, unsafe vehicles, dangerous or defective products, workplace injuries (worker's compensation), construction site accidents, claim denials by insurance companies, dangerous drugs, defective children's products, nursing home abuse and neglect, and falls due to unsafe conditions (slip and fall).

Attorney Joseph A Quinn, Jr. is one of only 100 attorneys in the United States (and one of only three in Pennsylvania) honored with membership in the Inner Circle of Trial Advocates, and one of only 500 attorneys worldwide chosen to be a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers. He has been a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer every year since the program began and has been listed in The Best Lawyers in America every year since the publication was established in 1987. Best Lawyers also named him top personal injury attorney for Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley. In addition, Best Lawyers, in conjunction with U.S. News & World Report, has designated HKQ a Tier 1 Best Law Firm across multiple categories in Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley.

Since the inception of the firm, the Commercial / Corporate Team led by Attorney Allan Kluger has provided comprehensive, integrated legal services to many of Northeastern and Eastern Pennsylvania's largest corporations, businesses, banks, non-profits and institutions, handling matters involving labor and employment, wills, trusts and estate planning, estate administration, elder law, commercial transactions, residential and commercial real estate, zoning, land use and development, telecommunications, mediations and arbitrations, commercial litigation, title insurance, business planning and business succession, corporate/business structuring, employment discrimination law for employers, banking, creditor’s rights, finance, lender liability defense, covenants not to compete, construction law, mergers and acquisitions and other business matters.

Additional information can be found at or by calling (800) 760-1529.



As Hourigan, Kluger and Quinn addresses the concerns raised by COVID-19, the health and safety of our clients, employees and friends of the firm remain our top priority.

These are very difficult and scary times and we hope that you and your loved ones are safe and symptom free. We recognize that so many of you are understandably anxious about your health, the economic impact of this pandemic and all of the consequences of social isolation.

We also recognize that many of you are anxious about how the coronavirus is impacting the Court systems, our firm and your cases. Although all of our offices are closed, our firm has remained fully operational and we have initiated procedures that allow all of our attorneys and staff to work remotely from their homes. Each of us and our staff will respond to any emails and calls about your cases as quickly as possible.

Our Federal and State Courts have instituted significant changes in their calendars as a result of the coronavirus. Although most courthouses are closed to the public, and Hearings and Trials will be delayed for some time, there are matters that can proceed telephonically and by video. Despite these changes in the Court calendars, we are working diligently on your cases and are determined to do whatever we possibly can to assure an early and just recovery for you and your loved ones. Even under these difficult circumstances, we believe that "Nobody will work harder for you than we will."

With regard to new potential clients, we are not in a position to have an in-person new client meeting, but we will be conducting these initial meetings via phone. New potential clients should call us for a free telephone consultation at (570) 287-3000.


Back to Top